Real disagreements are challenging to accomplish, or even tougher to keep up, for the ghost of ultimate contract continually haunts them. The Babylonian Talmud, notwithstanding, escapes from that ghost of contract, and provokes unsettling questions: Are there any stipulations lower than which war of words could represent a real courting among minds? Are disagreements continuously simply transitority steps towards ultimate contract? needs to a neighborhood of confrontation continuously indicate contract, as in an contract to disagree? what's Talmud? rethinks the duty of philological, literary, old, and cultural research of the Talmud. It introduces a facet of this job that has most sensible been approximated through the philosophical, anthropological, and ontological interrogation of individual in courting to the Other-whether animal, divine, or human. In either engagement and disengagement with post-Heideggerian traditions of suggestion, Sergey Dogopolski enhances philological-historical and cultural ways to the Talmud with a rigorous anthropological, ontological, and Talmudic inquiry. He redefines where of the Talmud and its examine, either conventional and educational, within the highbrow map of the West, arguing that Talmud is a scholarly artwork of its personal and represents a primary highbrow self-discipline, now not an insignificant software of logical, grammatical, or perhaps rhetorical arts for the aim of textual hermeneutics. In Talmudic highbrow paintings, war of words is a primary class. what's Talmud? rediscovers war of words because the final situation of finite human life or co-existence.